The Split Cover Explosion
Covers used to be
pieces of art. The Saturday Evening Post featured a
different Rockwell picture of Americana each issue,
while Vogue would have a portrait of a well-dressed
woman on its covers. Other magazines like Reader's Digest
would use its cover space as a table of contents, listing
every article or feature within its pages. This is no
longer the case.
Today covers are designed for a first time audience.
With over 7,150 consumer magazines alive in the United
States, a cover can no longer be anything but an attention-grabbing
facet of a publication. Covers must scream from the
newsstand with large, engaging pictures and interesting
cover lines or what I like to call sell lines. The cover
is very much like the front windows of a store. As shoppers
walk by, the displays should catch their eyes and make
them want to come inside and shop. No intelligent shop
owner would simply place a handwritten list of everything
he sells in his store up in the front window. The same
is true for magazines. We must catch the passersby and
convince them that they will be missing out if they
do not buy our publication.
One way the industry has latched onto recently to catch
the buyer’s eye has been the split cover. A few
years ago the split cover was reserved for anniversary
or special editions and were collectible. Now it seems
that every magazine has at least one additional cover
each issue. I see merit in some, but for the most part,
these split covers raise more questions in my mind than
they answer. Three main questions have come up as I
have seen the barrage of split covers on the newsstands
the last few months:
First, where is the wisdom in a split cover? A split
cover can be a very useful selling point for a magazine,
but just because we have the technology to make a split
cover happen every issue for every magazine does that
necessarily mean we should?
Second, do we carefully consider the impact of split
covers have on sales and the relationship of the magazine
with its readers? As I just mentioned, split covers
used to be collectibles that came around on important
occasions, but what reason does a reader have for buying
two different covers if only a few lines are different?
Also, how do we indelibly bind readers to our product
that is not even consistent in look from one newsstand
to the other? If we are marketing our magazines as a
product or brand that should be distinguished in less
than the 2.5-second attention span our average audience
member has, how does a split cover affect that perception
of brand? A friend of mine was so disappointed that
her magazine cover, as a loyal subscriber, was uglier
than the one on the newsstands. She wondered whether
the industry will continue to penalize their loyal followers
and continue to cater for the marginal readers, in the
same way they do with subscription prices.
And third, do readers really care about these split
covers? I’m sure that very few people that aren’t
obsessed with magazines like I am actually go out and
buy all the split covers they can find. And will the
placement of one cover line really increase newsstand
sales enough to warrant the extra work put into producing
a second cover?
We are a business that sells content to customers. The
box that Godiva chocolates come in is just as important
as the chocolate inside, but only in telling customers
what quality product they are investing their money
in. The same is true with our magazines. We must always
remain focused on what we have within our pages and
make it a quality product. This is not to say that split
covers aren’t useful and great things that should
be used; however, we should always question why we do
what we do and how it affects the content we wish to
sell to our readers. And, by the way, selling Whitman’s
chocolate inside a Godvia box will not do the trick
either! Happy reading and looking at some of the split
covers gracing our newsstands these days.
Ladies' Home
Journal (3 covers) |
|
Midwest Living (4 covers) |
|
National Geographic for Kids (3 covers) |
|
People Style
Watch (3 covers) |
|
Quick and Simple (2 covers) |
|
Sports Illustrated (2 out of 5 covers) |
|
Stop Smiling (2 out of 4 covers) |
|
|